Dr.MetabolicMD said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
pat_auckland said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Dr.MetabolicMD said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.