AmyNC_wife said:

I did go to 2.4mg in the end, and the honest report is that it bought me less than the step before it and cost me two bad weeks.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.

AmyNC_wife said:

I did go to 2.4mg in the end, and the honest report is that it bought me less than the step before it and cost me two bad weeks.

Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.

AmyNC_wife said:

I did go to 2.4mg in the end, and the honest report is that it bought me less than the step before it and cost me two bad weeks.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

Dr.DermMIA said:

It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.

Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.