A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
LabKate said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Pushing back on LabKate here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
LabKate said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsLabKate said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Taking it to my next appointment.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.