Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
chris_chi24 said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
chris_chi24 said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Coming at chris_chi24’s question from a different direction. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Following on from chris_chi24 — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?