wanda_boise said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
wanda_boise said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
wanda_boise said:Update since I posted: I held at 1.7mg for a further twelve weeks and lost another 4kg slowly, which settles it for me.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
carl_compliance said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.