Mar 6, 2025 at 7:04 PM#41
Dr.LipidDallas said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
33 6wanda_boise, NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 7, 2025 at 11:52 PM#42
Dr.LipidDallas said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
34 7labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 9, 2025 at 4:39 AM#43
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.
35 8DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMar 10, 2025 at 9:26 AM#44
One thing that is still open after Dr.LipidDallas’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
36 9nick_SD_fit, ben_calgary, patPC_UT and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 11, 2025 at 2:12 PM#45
alex_tucson said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
I read this differently from alex_tucson, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Last edited: Mar 11, 2025 at 7:12 PM
37 10adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report