🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsExercise & Body CompositionDEXA scan longitudinal data — looking for input

DEXA scan longitudinal data — looking for input

AussieAnna Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 5:51 AM 27 replies 1,475 viewsPage 1 of 6
This thread is more than 7 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
AussieAnna
Member
678
2,890
Jun 2024
Sydney, AU
Oct 20, 2025 at 5:51 AM#1

I'm so tired of the narrative that GLP-1 medications inevitably cause devastating muscle loss and there's nothing you can do about it. Here are my three DEXA scans over 9 months on tirzepatide:

MetricBaseline (Jun '25)4.5 Months (Oct '25)9 Months (Mar '26)
Total Weight231 lbs207 lbs193 lbs
Body Fat %34.8%28.1%22.4%
Fat Mass80.4 lbs58.2 lbs43.2 lbs
Lean Mass144.2 lbs142.8 lbs144.6 lbs
Appendicular Lean Mass62.8 lbs63.1 lbs65.4 lbs
Bone Mineral6.4 lbs6.4 lbs6.5 lbs

Read that again: lean mass went from 144.2 to 144.6 lbs while I lost 38 lbs total. Appendicular lean mass (arms + legs — the best proxy for actual skeletal muscle) INCREASED by 2.6 lbs.

My protocol:

  • Progressive resistance training 4x/week (PPL + extra leg day)
  • Protein: 180-200g/day (1g per lb of GOAL body weight)
  • Creatine: 5g/day
  • Sleep: 7-8 hours strictly
  • Caloric deficit was moderate — roughly 500-700 cal/day, not the extreme deficits some people end up in

M/36, 5'11". I was not a total beginner to lifting but I was detrained — hadn't lifted seriously in about 3 years before starting this.

39 9TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Oct 20, 2025 at 6:16 AM#2

This is compelling data. The appendicular lean mass increase is particularly noteworthy because ALM is less confounded by water/organ weight changes than total lean mass. A 2.6 lb ALM increase during a 38-lb weight loss is genuinely impressive.

A few caveats for scientific rigor:

  1. Creatine supplementation can increase intramuscular water retention, which DEXA reads as lean mass. Estimated effect: 2-4 lbs. Were you taking creatine before the baseline scan?
  2. DEXA has a coefficient of variation of about 1-2% for lean mass measurements, so small changes should be interpreted cautiously.
  3. That said, even accounting for both of these, you almost certainly maintained your baseline muscle mass, which is itself an excellent outcome during significant weight loss.
38 8tyler_CSCS, VanRx_Mike, steve_okc and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Oct 20, 2025 at 6:41 AM#3

Fair points. To address #1: no, I started creatine at the same time I started tirzepatide, so the baseline scan was pre-creatine. That means some of the lean mass "preservation" could be creatine-related water. If we assume 3 lbs of that is intramuscular water, I'd be at 141.6 lbs of "real" lean mass vs. 144.2 baseline — still only a 2.6 lb loss during a 38 lb weight loss, which is exceptional by any standard.

Re: DEXA variability — all three scans were done on the same machine, same facility, same time of day, fasted. I tried to control as many variables as possible.

37 7RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
pat_auckland
Member
345
1,567
Jun 2024
Auckland, NZ
Oct 20, 2025 at 7:06 AM#4

How did you manage 180-200g protein per day while on a GLP-1? I'm struggling to hit 100g. The appetite suppression makes it really hard to eat enough, and protein is the most satiating macro so it's a double whammy.

Last edited: Oct 20, 2025 at 11:06 AM
36 6MeganSA_TX, LarryQC_SD, wanda_boise and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Oct 20, 2025 at 9:22 AM#5

It's a genuine challenge. Here's what works for me:

  • Protein shake first thing in the morning (40g) — liquid calories are much easier when appetite is suppressed
  • Greek yogurt + protein powder as a snack (35g)
  • Two meals centered around lean protein (chicken, fish, lean beef) — about 40-50g each
  • Casein shake before bed (25g)

Some days I still fall short and land around 150g. But consistency over perfection. I also time my biggest meal about 2 hours after training when appetite is slightly higher.

Last edited: Oct 20, 2025 at 2:22 PM
35 5InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL, SaraMom3 and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1236

Similar Threads

Resistance training prevents 73% lean mass loss on semaglutide — RCT review11 replies
DEXA scan longitudinal data — 12 months on GLP-1 + lifting18 replies
Zone 2 cardio + GLP-1: synergistic metabolic benefits — evidence18 replies
Creatine kinase elevations on GLP-1 — exercise-induced or concerning?14 replies
Body recomposition protocol: GLP-1 + progressive overload + high protein8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register