🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOther Peptides & Research CompoundsIpamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience? Page 9

Ipamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience?

PedsEndoPhilly Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:05 PM 46 replies 2,741 viewsPage 9 of 10
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
Sep 22, 2024 at 10:11 AM#41
Dr.GastroMayo said:
It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.

Coming at Dr.GastroMayo’s question from a different direction. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

34 7Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Sep 22, 2024 at 8:49 PM#42

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

35 8MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Sep 23, 2024 at 7:27 AM#43

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Carry on.

Last edited: Sep 23, 2024 at 11:27 AM
36 9RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
SleepFixSam
Member
212
678
Nov 2024
Hawaii
Sep 23, 2024 at 6:06 PM#44
anders_CPH said:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

37 10denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ZaraB_AL
Member
456
1,678
Jan 2025
Alabama
Sep 24, 2024 at 4:45 AM#45
anders_CPH said:
Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.

38 11JennaRN, LabKate, kate.chem and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

BPC-157 oral vs injectable — bioavailability review and evidence15 replies
TB-500 for tissue repair — mechanism and clinical evidence4 replies
Selank and Semax — anxiolytic peptides overview2 replies
CJC-1295/Ipamorelin combination — GH secretagogue discussion23 replies
BPC-157 + GLP-1 stacking for gut healing — N=1 experience17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register