🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study Page 4

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study

kate.chem Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:18 AM 18 replies 450 viewsPage 4 of 4
HealthEcon_DC
Member
567
3,456
Apr 2024
Washington, DC
Jun 8, 2026 at 7:22 PM#16
PeptideChemSF said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.

1 24NeuroNate
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NicoleRaleigh
Member
356
1,567
Aug 2024
Raleigh, NC
Jun 8, 2026 at 8:16 PM#17
labquiet_amy said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:

  • No HPLC data: If there's no chromatography graph, it's not a real COA
  • Exact 100% purity: Suspicious — real testing always shows slight variation
  • No batch number: Can't trace back to specific production
  • No endotoxin testing: For injectables, this is essential
  • Template looks like it was made in Word: Professional labs have standardized formats

I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.

2 0MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.KarenChen
VIP Member
4,210
24,567
Nov 2023
San Francisco, CA
Jun 8, 2026 at 9:11 PM#18

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

Last edited: Jun 9, 2026 at 3:11 AM
3 1TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
greg_boulder
Member
345
1,567
Jul 2024
Boulder, CO
Jun 8, 2026 at 10:05 PM#19
NicoleRaleigh said:
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis: No HPLC data: If there's no…

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$138, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$208
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$128

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

4 2patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA, fiona_VT and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jun 8, 2026 at 10:59 PM#20

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out.

Last edited: Jun 9, 2026 at 12:59 AM
26 24PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
Janoshik vs in-house testing — third-party verification importance18 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register