NurseKim_ATL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
NurseKim_ATL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Dr.DermMIA said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
NurseKim_ATL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.