ingrid_STO said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
ingrid_STO said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
hank_denver said:Agreed on adaptation, with a caveat: adaptation applies to gastric emptying and not to everything.
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Taking it to my next appointment.
ingrid_STO said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
I read this differently from ingrid_STO, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.