Dr.DermMIA said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
kate.chem said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.
Dr.DermMIA said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.