One thing that is still open after DeniseRN_TPA’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Dr.AddMedPHL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Dr.AddMedPHL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDr.AddMedPHL said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.