GenomicsKate said:

There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.

A1cHero_PHX said:

Exercise-induced nausea amplification with training: I learned the hard way that intense exercise within 24 hours of injection can make nausea much…

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

GenomicsKate said:

There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.