🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingBatch-to-batch purity variation — looking for input

Batch-to-batch purity variation — looking for input

dan_philly Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 5:03 AM 12 replies 680 viewsPage 1 of 3
dan_philly
Member
456
2,123
Jul 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Apr 13, 2026 at 5:03 AM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

What I am after is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

Numbers rather than impressions, if you have them.

1 21DadBodDave
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RetaRick_CA
VIP Member
2,012
9,876
Jan 2024
California
Apr 13, 2026 at 6:22 AM#2

This one has a reasonably settled answer, so here it is. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

50 20AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Apr 13, 2026 at 7:41 AM#3
RetaRick_CA said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

No disagreement with RetaRick_CA. One condition attached. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

49 19paul_denver, TinaHashiRN, robert_kc and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
hans_munich
Member
534
2,345
Jul 2024
Munich, DE
Apr 13, 2026 at 9:00 AM#4
dan_philly said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

48 18tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Apr 13, 2026 at 4:40 PM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: Apr 13, 2026 at 6:40 PM
47 17GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register