🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingCommunity-funded testing initiative — 6 month update

Community-funded testing initiative — 6 month update

ricardo_MIA Sun, Apr 5, 2026 at 11:29 AM 10 replies 623 viewsPage 1 of 2
ricardo_MIA
Member
378
1,678
Sep 2024
Miami, FL
Apr 5, 2026 at 11:29 AM#1

Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

The four things to check on any report, in order: does it name your batch, who commissioned it, what method was used, and does it report content as well as purity. A report failing any of those is weak evidence regardless of the percentage on it.

So the question, as narrowly as I can put it: why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe.

I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.

1 21JakeSmashed95
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Apr 5, 2026 at 11:36 AM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

50 20PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DeniseRN_TPA
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Tampa, FL
Apr 5, 2026 at 11:43 AM#3
Dr.MetabolicMD said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

49 19tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul, jim_asheville and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
nick_SD_fit
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
San Diego, CA
Apr 5, 2026 at 11:50 AM#4
ricardo_MIA said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

Same position here, arrived at the long way round. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

Last edited: Apr 5, 2026 at 1:50 PM
48 18PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Apr 5, 2026 at 12:27 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.7% purity, 0.1% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

Last edited: Apr 5, 2026 at 6:27 PM
47 17sarah_nash92, FitDadDave, RunnerRach and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register