🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingResidual solvent testing on COAs — anyone have experience?

Residual solvent testing on COAs — anyone have experience?

Dr.ReproEndo Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 12:30 PM 7 replies 719 viewsPage 1 of 2
Dr.ReproEndo
Senior Member
1,890
8,901
Jan 2024
Scottsdale, AZ
Mar 19, 2026 at 12:30 PM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

The bit I cannot resolve on my own is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

Tell me what I have not thought of.

13 8mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NeuroNate
Senior Member
2,890
16,789
Dec 2023
Chicago, IL
Mar 19, 2026 at 12:47 PM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

12 7wendy_avl, jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Mar 19, 2026 at 1:04 PM#3
NeuroNate said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Last edited: Mar 19, 2026 at 3:04 PM
11 6patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA, fiona_VT and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
sophie_paris
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Paris, FR
Mar 19, 2026 at 1:21 PM#4
Dr.ReproEndo said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

10 5AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
chris_chi24
Member
389
1,678
Sep 2024
Chicago, IL
Mar 19, 2026 at 2:52 PM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 6 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: 3-day with temperature monitor
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 98.3% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 1 hours
Price: $131/month for tirzepatide 10mg equivalent

9 4SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register