Jun 24, 2025 at 2:45 AM#26
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
18 16wei_SG, cory_ATX, lori_vegas and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 26, 2025 at 12:56 PM#27
Dr.RaviCardio said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Last edited: Jun 26, 2025 at 4:56 PM
19 17newstart_MO, mia_MS2, LeilaHI and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 28, 2025 at 11:06 PM#28
Dr.RaviCardio said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
20 18HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg, bri_stats and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsJul 1, 2025 at 9:14 AM#29
Dr.RaviCardio said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Last edited: Jul 1, 2025 at 3:14 PM
21 19SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jul 3, 2025 at 7:21 PM#30
Closing the loop on my own question.
Closing this out. What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and worth saying anyway.
43 16marco_milano, pam_columbus, nick_SD_fit and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report