From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
Dr.NateNeph said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.NateNeph said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Coming at Dr.NateNeph’s question from a different direction. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
One thing that is still open after Dr.NateNeph’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?