One thing that is still open after Dr.SurgeonPGH’s answer:

How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?

tammy_FL said:

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

tammy_FL said:

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

Happy to go further on any of that.

tammy_FL said:

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Taking it to my next appointment.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.