🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsSide Effects & ManagementKidney stone risk on GLP-1 — my results so far Page 7

Kidney stone risk on GLP-1 — my results so far

NicoleRaleigh Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 1:10 PM 53 replies 2,543 viewsPage 7 of 11
EndoResFellow
Member
456
2,345
Sep 2024
Baltimore, MD
Feb 20, 2025 at 7:46 PM#31

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.

27 0robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SurmountFan_IN
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Feb 22, 2025 at 5:05 AM#32
EndoResFellow said:
The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.

28 1AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tyler_CSCS
Member
567
2,567
Jun 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Feb 23, 2025 at 2:23 PM#33
EndoResFellow said:
The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

29 2Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
LabKate
Senior Member
2,678
11,234
Jan 2024
Oregon
Feb 24, 2025 at 11:41 PM#34

One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.

30 3emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Feb 26, 2025 at 8:58 AM#35

One thing that is still open after EndoResFellow’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

31 4Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
15678911

Similar Threads

Nausea incidence by dose tier — STEP and SURMOUNT meta-analysis16 replies
Constipation on GLP-1: pathophysiology and fiber protocol5 replies
Alopecia on GLP-1 — telogen effluvium differential diagnosis3 replies
Gallbladder disease risk — cholelithiasis data from clinical trials12 replies
Pancreatitis risk assessment — pooled safety analysis15 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register