🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingInter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024

Inter-lab variability in peptide testing — July 2024

Dr.GastroMayo Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 1:04 AM 41 replies 1,493 viewsPage 1 of 9
This thread is more than 8 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Sep 19, 2025 at 1:04 AM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

The narrow version of the question is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

49 19mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.ObesityMed
VIP Member
3,456
19,234
Nov 2023
Denver, CO
Online
Sep 19, 2025 at 2:40 AM#2

Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

48 18PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
bbq_ray_KC
Member
378
1,678
Jul 2024
Kansas City, KS
Sep 19, 2025 at 4:16 AM#3
Dr.ObesityMed said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

47 17InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL, SaraMom3 and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
emma_london
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
London, UK
Sep 19, 2025 at 5:52 AM#4
Dr.GastroMayo said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Can confirm the pattern Dr.GastroMayo describes. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

46 16JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_nash
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Nashville, TN
Sep 19, 2025 at 3:13 PM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in the refrigerator.

Day 1: 100.5% purity
Day 14: 99.6% purity
Day 28: 98.1% purity

Minimal degradation over 28 days when properly refrigerated. This confirms the standard 28-day beyond-use date is appropriate. Beyond 28 days, I'd reconstitute a fresh vial to be safe.

45 15sarah.morrison, NeuroNate, JessicaH_TX and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1239

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register