Dr.LipidDallas said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
Dr.LipidDallas said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
Dr.LipidDallas said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
One concrete data point for the thread. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from Dr.LipidDallas — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Closing the loop on my own question.
Following up because I said I would. I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking. It resolved, and I cannot prove which half of that did it.