Following on from Dr.PeteFamMed — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Following on from Dr.PeteFamMed — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
TomTeleRx said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
TomTeleRx said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsTomTeleRx said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.