Dr.EM_Chicago said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:That is right, and it stops being right at the edges.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from Dr.EM_Chicago — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
anders_CPH said:Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.