🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Dr.PulmRoch Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 5:26 AM 16 replies 1,375 viewsPage 1 of 4
This thread is more than 10 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Jul 30, 2025 at 5:26 AM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

What I am trying to establish is whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

If the honest answer is that nobody knows, that is a useful answer and I would rather have it.

35 5rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_nyc
VIP Member
5,678
21,345
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jul 30, 2025 at 7:54 AM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

34 4stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
GenomicsKate
Member
345
1,890
Oct 2024
Cambridge, MA
Jul 30, 2025 at 10:22 AM#3
mike_nyc said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Agreeing with mike_nyc, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

Last edited: Jul 30, 2025 at 3:22 PM
33 3MarkLI_maint, Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
fiona_glasgow
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Glasgow, UK
Jul 30, 2025 at 12:50 PM#4
Dr.PulmRoch said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.

32 2JessicaH_TX, KevinCompounds, TirzTom and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
paige_pharma
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Omaha, NE
Jul 31, 2025 at 3:37 AM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 60 submitted tests:

  • 85% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 10% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 5% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

31 1lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register