🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing? Page 3

Has anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing?

Dr.AddMedPHL Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 10:18 PM 29 replies 1,689 viewsPage 3 of 6
Dr.SportsMedIN
Senior Member
1,456
6,789
Feb 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Jun 8, 2025 at 2:40 AM#11
TinaHashiRN said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 3 times from my current compounder.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 45 submitted tests:

  • 78% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 15% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 7% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2025 at 7:40 AM
11 9lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
robert_kc
Member
289
1,234
Oct 2024
Kansas City, MO
Jun 8, 2025 at 8:57 AM#12
Admin said:
One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Taking it to my next appointment.

12 10SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
nick_newbie
New Member
18
56
Jun 2026
Virginia
Online
Jun 8, 2025 at 3:14 PM#13
TinaHashiRN said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 3 times from my current compounder.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.3% purity, 0.1% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

13 11MeganSA_TX, LarryQC_SD, wanda_boise and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Jun 8, 2025 at 9:31 PM#14
Dr.AddMedPHL said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in the refrigerator.

Day 1: 100.1% purity
Day 14: 99.0% purity
Day 28: 98.1% purity

Minimal degradation over 28 days when properly refrigerated. This confirms the standard 28-day beyond-use date is appropriate. Beyond 28 days, I'd reconstitute a fresh vial to be safe.

14 12Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jun 9, 2025 at 3:48 AM#15

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

15 13PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register