🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsSide Effects & ManagementFAERS pharmacovigilance data for semaglutide — anyone have experience? Page 4

FAERS pharmacovigilance data for semaglutide — anyone have experience?

bri_stats Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:29 PM 36 replies 2,800 viewsPage 4 of 8
AussieAnna
Member
678
2,890
Jun 2024
Sydney, AU
Mar 30, 2024 at 2:10 PM#16
Dr.ObesityMed said:
bri_stats said: ...but the FDA says semaglutide...

Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

32 5TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
Mar 31, 2024 at 4:06 AM#17

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

Last edited: Mar 31, 2024 at 6:06 AM
33 6Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DadBodDave
Member
187
923
Nov 2024
Ohio
Mar 31, 2024 at 6:02 PM#18
james_edin said:
Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

Mine went the same way, slower.

34 7pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo, JakeBK_lifts and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
SallyK_inj
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Iowa
Apr 1, 2024 at 7:58 AM#19
james_edin said:
Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

Coming at james_edin’s question from a different direction. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.

35 8tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Apr 1, 2024 at 9:53 PM#20

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. No action needed from anybody.

Last edited: Apr 1, 2024 at 11:53 PM
7 5PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Nausea incidence by dose tier — STEP and SURMOUNT meta-analysis16 replies
Constipation on GLP-1: pathophysiology and fiber protocol5 replies
Alopecia on GLP-1 — telogen effluvium differential diagnosis3 replies
Gallbladder disease risk — cholelithiasis data from clinical trials12 replies
Pancreatitis risk assessment — pooled safety analysis15 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register