jim_asheville said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
jim_asheville said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
PeptideSynthNJ said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
PeptideSynthNJ said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. No action needed from anybody.