🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingLC-MS/MS vs HPLC for peptide analysis — November 2025 Page 3

LC-MS/MS vs HPLC for peptide analysis — November 2025

TrialTracker_MD Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 1:49 PM 39 replies 2,208 viewsPage 3 of 8
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Apr 27, 2025 at 8:41 PM#11
MASHdoc_SA said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.5% purity, 0.1% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

39 12mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Apr 28, 2025 at 4:20 AM#12
laura_annarbor said:
Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

40 13mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92, FitDadDave and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mel_PDX
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Portland, OR
Apr 28, 2025 at 11:59 AM#13
MASHdoc_SA said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.0% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 10 business days.

The test costs ~$138 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

41 14PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Apr 28, 2025 at 7:38 PM#14
TrialTracker_MD said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 6 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 99.9% to 100.3%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

42 15DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Apr 29, 2025 at 3:17 AM#15

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

43 16PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register