Writing this once so I can stop repeating it across threads. It is about certificates of analysis, and it is deliberately narrow — everything I am not confident about is marked as such.
What is actually established
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers. Does the report name the batch on your vial. Is the date consistent with when that batch existed. Is it addressed to the vendor or to the person who paid for the test. Was the sample taken from general stock or supplied by the vendor. A perfect certificate for a different batch is worth nothing, and vendor-supplied samples are the most common way a genuine report ends up misleading.
The condition it depends on
Mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.
The practical version
The four things to check on any report, in order: does it name your batch, who commissioned it, what method was used, and does it report content as well as purity. A report failing any of those is weak evidence regardless of the percentage on it.
What I am not sure about
What I am trying to establish is why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe. I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.
— RunnerRach · corrections welcome and will be edited into this post with credit