🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingEndotoxin testing methods — what worked for you? Page 4

Endotoxin testing methods — what worked for you?

kevin_tulsa Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 2:46 AM 37 replies 2,040 viewsPage 4 of 8
wanda_boise
Member
412
1,890
Aug 2024
Boise, ID
Oct 20, 2024 at 2:43 PM#16
Dr.PeteFamMed said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.

Last edited: Oct 20, 2024 at 7:43 PM
16 14DanielChem_CHI, marco_milano, pam_columbus and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tampaLisa73
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Tampa, FL
Oct 20, 2024 at 5:36 PM#17
TirzTom said:
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis: No HPLC data: If there's no…

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 4 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: 2-day priority with gel ice
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 99.5% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 4 hours
Price: $141/month for semaglutide 1.7mg equivalent

Last edited: Oct 20, 2024 at 6:36 PM
17 15FitDadDave, RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DoseLogDan
Member
201
567
Feb 2025
Montana
Oct 20, 2024 at 8:29 PM#18
TirzTom said:
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis: No HPLC data: If there's no…

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.6% purity, 0.0% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

18 16mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Oct 20, 2024 at 11:22 PM#19

Following on from TirzTom — and this may be the naive question:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

Last edited: Oct 21, 2024 at 2:22 AM
19 17amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Oct 21, 2024 at 2:15 AM#20

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source.

41 14PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register