🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing? Page 5

Has anyone dealt with janoshik vs in-house testing?

KristenIndy Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:46 PM 40 replies 2,563 viewsPage 5 of 8
andrew_nyc
Member
534
2,345
Apr 2024
New York, NY
Sep 16, 2024 at 3:18 PM#21

One thing that is still open after TrialNerd_Beth’s answer:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

46 19Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
rick_sfbay
Member
289
1,234
Jan 2025
San Francisco, CA
Sep 18, 2024 at 1:38 AM#22
MASHdoc_SA said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 6 times from my current compounder.

COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:

  • No HPLC data: If there's no chromatography graph, it's not a real COA
  • Exact 100% purity: Suspicious — real testing always shows slight variation
  • No batch number: Can't trace back to specific production
  • No endotoxin testing: For injectables, this is essential
  • Template looks like it was made in Word: Professional labs have standardized formats

I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.

47 20NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Sep 19, 2024 at 11:58 AM#23
MASHdoc_SA said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 6 times from my current compounder.

Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.

Happy to go further on any of that.

48 21paul_denver, TinaHashiRN, robert_kc and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
steph_laguna
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Laguna Beach, CA
Sep 20, 2024 at 10:17 PM#24
MASHdoc_SA said:
My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 6 times from my current compounder.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

49 22DanielChem_CHI, marco_milano, pam_columbus and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BariatricNurseD
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Dallas, TX
Online
Sep 22, 2024 at 8:35 AM#25

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

50 23Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register