🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingUnderstanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you? Page 3

Understanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you?

andrew_nyc Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 12:22 PM 25 replies 2,441 viewsPage 3 of 5
Dr.LeslieOBGYN
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Dallas, TX
Jul 10, 2024 at 8:16 PM#11
Dr.SleepRoch said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

45 18Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
Jul 11, 2024 at 5:43 AM#12

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Vendor quality matters when discussing certificates of analysis. I've tested my last 6 batches through Janoshik and purity has ranged from 97.9% to 100.3%. Consistency is key.

For anyone new: always request the COA, and consider independent verification. The $300 for a Janoshik test is worth the peace of mind.

Last edited: Jul 11, 2024 at 8:43 AM
46 19tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
julia.endo
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Feb 2024
Cincinnati, OH
Jul 11, 2024 at 3:10 PM#13
DeniseRN_TPA said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 99.2% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 8 business days.

The test costs ~$143 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: Jul 11, 2024 at 9:10 PM
47 20hans_munich, jason_sac26, chris_chi24 and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
josh_phd_bmore
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Baltimore, MD
Jul 12, 2024 at 12:37 AM#14
andrew_nyc said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 59 submitted tests:

  • 75% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 18% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 7% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

48 21KarenAZ_mom, zoe_NC, Dr.ObesityLA and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jul 12, 2024 at 10:04 AM#15

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.

49 22PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register