🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingCOA database project — my results so far Page 2

COA database project — my results so far

nick_SD_fit Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 6:08 AM 13 replies 2,095 viewsPage 2 of 3
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Jun 26, 2024 at 7:39 AM#6
nick_SD_fit said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

14 9fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DadBodDave
Member
187
923
Nov 2024
Ohio
Jun 26, 2024 at 8:14 AM#7

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong?

13 8JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.LipidDallas
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Dallas, TX
Jun 26, 2024 at 8:49 AM#8
DanielChem_CHI said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.3 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.5%
Related substances: 0.8% (single impurity at 10.3 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

12 7cory_ATX, lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
nick_SD_fit
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
San Diego, CA
Jun 26, 2024 at 9:24 AM#9

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

11 6PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ZaraB_AL
Member
456
1,678
Jan 2025
Alabama
Jun 26, 2024 at 12:14 PM#10
Dr.LipidDallas said:
My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed: Main peak retention time:…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

39 12JennaRN, LabKate, kate.chem and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register