🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHow to commission independent testing — need advice Page 4

How to commission independent testing — need advice

wendy_avl Thu, May 2, 2024 at 11:19 PM 18 replies 2,066 viewsPage 4 of 4
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
May 12, 2024 at 10:05 PM#16

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 5 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: Same-day local pickup
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 97.2% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 6 hours
Price: $146/month for semaglutide 2.4mg equivalent

12 10HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg, bri_stats and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tyler_CSCS
Member
567
2,567
Jun 2024
Phoenix, AZ
May 14, 2024 at 12:41 PM#17
BiostatsBrad said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.3% purity.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$127, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$227
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$107

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

13 11hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PathRoch
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
May 16, 2024 at 3:16 AM#18
BiostatsBrad said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.3% purity.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 62 submitted tests:

  • 82% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 12% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 6% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

14 12WendyG_ATL, SaraMom3, Dr.MetabolicMD and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
rachel_ABQ
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Albuquerque, NM
May 17, 2024 at 5:50 PM#19

One thing that is still open after BiostatsBrad’s answer:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

15 13SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
May 19, 2024 at 8:23 AM#20

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

37 10PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register