🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHas anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see? Page 5

Has anyone dealt with are all coas created equal? mine looks different from others i see?

SteveThurs Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:31 PM 36 replies 2,454 viewsPage 5 of 8
AussieAnna
Member
678
2,890
Jun 2024
Sydney, AU
Feb 19, 2024 at 3:36 PM#21
KristenIndy said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.

25 23TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SportsMedIN
Senior Member
1,456
6,789
Feb 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Feb 23, 2024 at 2:30 PM#22
KristenIndy said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity.

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 4 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: 2-day priority with gel ice
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 98.5% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 4 hours
Price: $133/month for tirzepatide 10mg equivalent

26 24lisa_labSD, adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Feb 27, 2024 at 1:21 PM#23

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.

27 0maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
MikeNYC_runner
Member
378
1,678
Jul 2024
New York, NY
Mar 2, 2024 at 12:10 PM#24

One thing that is still open after KristenIndy’s answer:

How long did you give it before you decided it was working?

Last edited: Mar 2, 2024 at 2:10 PM
28 1GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
GraceAZ_72
Member
156
678
Jan 2025
Tucson, AZ
Mar 6, 2024 at 10:57 AM#25
TrialTracker_MD said:
If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

29 2RetaRick_CA, JenPlateau, SallyK_inj and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register