🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice Page 3

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Dr.CardioMD Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:22 AM 14 replies 2,095 viewsPage 3 of 3
HPLC_Greg
Senior Member
1,890
8,901
Feb 2024
Research Triangle, NC
Jan 10, 2024 at 4:37 AM#11
NurseLeah_Nash said:
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis: No HPLC data: If there's no…

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$140, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$210
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$120

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

Last edited: Jan 10, 2024 at 10:37 AM
50 23SallyK_inj, CryptoCarl, MariaRD and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ricardo_MIA
Member
378
1,678
Sep 2024
Miami, FL
Jan 10, 2024 at 6:48 AM#12
ChrisMacros said:
One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable.

Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

1 24ZaraB_AL
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tampaLisa73
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Tampa, FL
Jan 10, 2024 at 8:59 AM#13
NurseLeah_Nash said:
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis: No HPLC data: If there's no…

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.2 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.8%
Related substances: 0.5% (single impurity at 10.5 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

Last edited: Jan 10, 2024 at 9:59 AM
2 0sarah_nash92, FitDadDave
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
DoseLogDan
Member
201
567
Feb 2025
Montana
Jan 10, 2024 at 11:10 AM#14
Dr.CardioMD said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members. Across 47 submitted tests:

  • 75% tested at ≥98% purity
  • 18% tested at 95-98% purity
  • 7% tested at <95% purity (concerning)

The vendors with consistently high purity results are listed in the Vendor Directory. We update monthly based on new community submissions.

3 1sophie_paris, mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Jan 10, 2024 at 1:21 PM#15

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

4 2PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register