Dr.NateNeph said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.
Dr.NateNeph said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Posting only so the count is not one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.LeslieOBGYN said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
One concrete data point for the thread. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.