anders_CPH said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
anders_CPH said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
fiona_VT said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
anders_CPH said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again.