BrianDallas92 said:Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
BrianDallas92 said:Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
One concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after BrianDallas92’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Dr.PathRoch said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.