Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsClosing the loop on my own question.
Closing the loop. The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.
One thing that is still open after Dr.EM_Chicago’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?