Reporting back.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Reporting back.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Following on from Dr.EndoIndy — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
PharmD_Rodriguez said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Pushing back on PharmD_Rodriguez here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemPharmD_Rodriguez said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.