Dr.SportsMedIN said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
VanRx_Mike said:Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
Dr.SportsMedIN said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.