jennifer_SEA said:Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
jennifer_SEA said:Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.
Coming at jennifer_SEA’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
lucas_SP_BR said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.