steve_okc said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
steve_okc said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Coming at steve_okc’s question from a different direction. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after steve_okc’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
DataDave said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on DataDave here. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.