🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesMetabolic syndrome reversal criteria — what worked for you? Page 11

Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — what worked for you?

anna.melb_AU Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:40 PM 61 replies 3,475 viewsPage 11 of 13
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
Dec 7, 2024 at 9:06 PM#51

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

35 10Dr.LipidDallas, alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RetaRick_CA
VIP Member
2,012
9,876
Jan 2024
California
Dec 17, 2024 at 11:09 AM#52
PharmHunterJen said:
Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

34 9AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
marcus_mpls
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Dec 27, 2024 at 1:18 AM#53
PharmHunterJen said:
Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

33 8tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Jan 5, 2025 at 3:33 PM#54

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.

Last edited: Jan 5, 2025 at 6:33 PM
32 7jennifer_SEA, tyler_CSCS, VanRx_Mike and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
GraceAZ_72
Member
156
678
Jan 2025
Tucson, AZ
Jan 15, 2025 at 5:53 AM#55

One thing that is still open after PharmHunterJen’s answer:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

Last edited: Jan 15, 2025 at 9:53 AM
31 6RetaRick_CA, JenPlateau, SallyK_inj and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register