🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesGLP-1 and peripheral arterial disease — claudication improvement data

GLP-1 and peripheral arterial disease — claudication improvement data

Dr.CardioMD Wed, May 27, 2026 at 12:54 AM 8 replies 449 viewsPage 1 of 2
Dr.CardioMD
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Cleveland, OH
May 27, 2026 at 12:54 AM#1

Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

What would genuinely help is knowing how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

3 23kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO, wendy_avl
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
May 27, 2026 at 1:38 AM#2
Dr.CardioMD said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

Cardiac biomarkers and cardiovascular risk: my cardiologist ordered advanced cardiac labs given my family history. Results were encouraging:

  • NT-proBNP: 56 pg/mL (normal, cardiac function preserved)
  • Lp(a): 56 nmol/L (genetic, unchanged — expected)
  • ApoB: dropped from 141 to 96 mg/dL (excellent response)
  • Coronary calcium score: 0 (unchanged from baseline — reassuring)

The ApoB reduction is particularly meaningful — it's considered the best single predictor of cardiovascular risk. GLP-1 therapy seems to improve this consistently.

Last edited: May 27, 2026 at 3:38 AM
2 22KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tony_orlando
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Orlando, FL
May 27, 2026 at 2:22 AM#3
VendorMark said:
Cardiac biomarkers and cardiovascular risk: my cardiologist ordered advanced cardiac labs given my family history.

I'm 62 years old and want to share my perspective on cardiovascular risk as an older member of this community.

My doctor was initially hesitant because of my age, but the SELECT trial included patients up to 72 and showed consistent benefit across age groups. We started at the lowest dose with closer monitoring.

9 months later: down 36 lbs, off metoprolol, A1C from 7.2% to 5.3%. My cardiologist is thrilled. cardiovascular risk is absolutely relevant for older adults — don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

1 21ZaraB_AL
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
Dr.EndoIndy
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Indianapolis, IN
May 27, 2026 at 3:06 AM#4
Dr.CardioMD said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.

50 20DeniseRN_TPA, SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.AddMedPHL
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Philadelphia, PA
May 27, 2026 at 7:13 AM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Dr.CardioMD said:
...we don't know the long-term effects of cardiovascular risk...

This is a fair point, and I think intellectual honesty requires acknowledging it. GLP-1 agonists in their current form have ~8-10 years of human exposure data. That's not nothing, but it's not 30+ years either.

However: the risk-benefit calculation should also consider the KNOWN long-term effects of untreated obesity — diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, joint destruction, reduced lifespan by 5-10 years.

Uncertainty about GLP-1 long-term safety vs certainty about obesity consequences. The calculus seems clear to me, but reasonable people can disagree.

Last edited: May 27, 2026 at 9:13 AM
49 19JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register