🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesGLP-1 and arterial inflammation — 6 month update

GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — 6 month update

Dr.EM_Chicago Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 7:57 AM 10 replies 716 viewsPage 1 of 2
Dr.EM_Chicago
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Chicago, IL
Apr 20, 2026 at 7:57 AM#1

My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

So the question, as narrowly as I can put it: how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.

3 23jim_asheville, matt_MKE, Dr.ReproEndo
Reply Quote Save Share Report
julia.endo
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Feb 2024
Cincinnati, OH
Apr 20, 2026 at 8:40 AM#2
Dr.EM_Chicago said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.
Dr.EM_Chicago said:
...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

I understand the skepticism — we've all seen "miracle" weight loss solutions come and go. But consider what makes GLP-1 agonists different:

  • Phase 3 RCTs with thousands of participants (not 20-person pilot studies)
  • Published in NEJM, JAMA, Lancet (not press releases)
  • Replicated across multiple independent research groups
  • Proven cardiovascular and renal benefits beyond weight loss
  • Biological mechanism fully characterized at the receptor level

This isn't a fad — it's a new drug class supported by the highest level of clinical evidence. The comparison to past fads is understandable but inappropriate.

Last edited: Apr 20, 2026 at 2:40 PM
2 22mark_tokyo, hans_munich
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jennifer_SEA
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Seattle, WA
Apr 20, 2026 at 9:23 AM#3
julia.endo said:
Dr.EM_Chicago said: ...cardiovascular risk is just another fad...

I'm 62 years old and want to share my perspective on cardiovascular risk as an older member of this community.

My doctor was initially hesitant because of my age, but the SELECT trial included patients up to 72 and showed consistent benefit across age groups. We started at the lowest dose with closer monitoring.

9 months later: down 56 lbs, off lisinopril, A1C from 7.2% to 5.3%. My cardiologist is thrilled. cardiovascular risk is absolutely relevant for older adults — don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

1 21matt_MKE
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
sarah_nash92
Member
712
3,123
Jun 2024
Nashville, TN
Apr 20, 2026 at 10:06 AM#4
Dr.EM_Chicago said:
My reason for being on this is cardiovascular rather than cosmetic, which puts me in a small minority in most of these threads.

Second this. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

50 20CanadaChris, ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95 and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Apr 20, 2026 at 2:09 PM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: a nuance that matters. Unlike most lipid markers, Lp(a) is 90%+ genetically determined and doesn't really change with weight loss or GLP-1 therapy.

My Lp(a) has remained at 48 nmol/L across all time points. If yours is elevated (>50 nmol/L), you need additional risk mitigation strategies regardless of your GLP-1 response. Don't assume your medication is covering all cardiovascular risk factors.

49 19SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register