🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCardiovascular OutcomesShould I be worried about my heart rate going up? — what worked for you?

Should I be worried about my heart rate going up? — what worked for you?

BiostatsBrad Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 7:18 AM 8 replies 854 viewsPage 1 of 2
BiostatsBrad
Member
456
2,345
Jul 2024
Durham, NC
Jan 28, 2026 at 7:18 AM#1

Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

What I actually want to know is how much of the SELECT benefit is plausibly independent of the weight loss, and whether that distinction changes anything practical.

Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

38 16LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
COA_Karl
Senior Member
2,123
8,901
Jan 2024
Pennsylvania
Jan 28, 2026 at 7:29 AM#2
BiostatsBrad said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 62 years old and started this journey skeptically. My cardiologist recommended it after years of failed interventions.

10 months later: down 50 lbs, more mobile, pain reduced, medications simplified. My quality of life has improved dramatically. I wish this existed 20 years ago.

To other older adults hesitating: the SELECT trial proved benefit in our age group. You deserve to feel good in your body regardless of age.

39 17jim_asheville, matt_MKE, Dr.ReproEndo and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
matt_MKE
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Milwaukee, WI
Jan 28, 2026 at 7:40 AM#3
COA_Karl said:
Senior perspective on cardiovascular risk: I'm 62 years old and started this journey skeptically.
COA_Karl said:
...we don't know the long-term effects of cardiovascular risk...

This is a fair point, and I think intellectual honesty requires acknowledging it. GLP-1 agonists in their current form have ~8-10 years of human exposure data. That's not nothing, but it's not 30+ years either.

However: the risk-benefit calculation should also consider the KNOWN long-term effects of untreated obesity — diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, joint destruction, reduced lifespan by 5-10 years.

Uncertainty about GLP-1 long-term safety vs certainty about obesity consequences. The calculus seems clear to me, but reasonable people can disagree.

40 18GraceAZ_72, carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
TinaHashiRN
Member
345
1,567
Sep 2024
Raleigh, NC
Jan 28, 2026 at 7:51 AM#4
BiostatsBrad said:
Prescribed on cardiovascular grounds rather than for weight, and almost everything written for patients assumes the opposite.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Posting only so the count is not one.

Last edited: Jan 28, 2026 at 1:51 PM
41 19Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jan 28, 2026 at 8:51 AM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Mendelian randomization evidence supporting GLP-1 pathway modulation for cardiovascular risk: genetic variants in the GLP1R gene region associated with lower BMI also show associations with reduced cardiovascular risk, confirming a causal pathway[1].

This "natural experiment" (people born with genetically higher GLP-1 signaling being leaner and healthier) provides orthogonal evidence supporting the pharmacological approach. When genetic epidemiology, clinical trials, and mechanistic studies all converge, confidence in the therapeutic approach is high.

References:
[1] Zheng SL, et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(12):869-879.
42 20hank_denver, carlos_SATX, sophie_paris and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial: 20% MACE reduction — mechanistic deep dive7 replies
Semaglutide cardiovascular benefit independent of weight loss11 replies
STEP-HFpEF: semaglutide in heart failure with preserved EF15 replies
GLP-1 and arterial inflammation — hsCRP and IL-6 reduction data18 replies
Lp(a) on GLP-1 agonists — any impact on this risk factor?8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register